The Truth About Live Exports

But doesn’t the live export industry employ people?

Live export also exports jobs. Jobs in abattoirs and downstream processing are exported overseas.

Large meat processors, such as Fletchers International, say if they had access to stock, they could employ this number of people plus many more.

The live export industry likes to say that it employs around 13,000. This is somewhat questionable.  When asked for a breakdown and further clarification of these figures, it has not been forthcoming. Some estimates put the numbers of jobs lost in the value-adding industries, due to live exports at 250,000.

We know that the majority of people would still be required in a chilled meat trade, such as sheep and cattle farmers, stock-hands, stock transport drivers, shearers etc… These people are also employed within the meat processing sector and are not employed exclusively within the live export industry.

But aren't the mortalities on board only 1%?

Immense animal suffering is hidden in statistics.

1% of mortalities equal approximately 35,000 animals every year.

The live export industry measures animal welfare by counting how many animals have fallen down dead. A death statistic tells us nothing about the other animals who have endured the same extremely hot, cramped, ammonia-filled conditions.

Most animals who die onboard ships are found dead in their pens: they are not humanely euthanised before they reach that point.

 

Are the livestock ships suitable for humanely carrying animals?

Some vessels, such as the Al Kuwait, are old, converted oil tankers. Some decks on the Al Kuwait, are only around 1 metre high and the sheep in those decks are cramped together in near darkness.

Other vessels, such as the Ocean Shearer, are specially made for carrying livestock. However, the Ocean Shearer has caused some very poor animals welfare outcomes.

In February 2010 the cattle on the lower decks of the Ocean Shearer were observed to be in severe respiratory distress for several days continuously. Some of the animals were in such bad condition they were slumped on the deck or hunched over and drooling. Others were agitated and panting.

The Department of Agriculture Report on this voyage found that animals on the Ocean Shearer, particularly on the lower decks, were subject to extreme heat stress, high humidity and high levels of ammonia. The Department of Agriculture postulated that the lower decks of the Ocean Shearer possibly have 'hot spots' which cause animals to suffer and die.

NOTE: The Ocean Shearer was decommisioned in 2012, but there are still ships used to transport animals that are in worse condition than she was.

Is the live export industry regulated by the government?

There is a scant amount of animal welfare legislation in place. However, there is no government agency enforcing that legislation.

Live exporters are obliged to comply with the Australian Standards for the Export of Livestock (ASEL), administered by the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS). ASEL only governs the condition of animals fit for loading and does not cover animal cruelty.

AQIS's only assessment of animal welfare is to briefly glance at animals as they are running up the loading ramp onto the ship. Our observation is that AQIS frequently fails not spot blind, lame or injured animals.

Live exporters are also bound by the Animal Welfare Acts in each state. Due to a lack of funding by the WA State Government, livestock facilities in WA are seldom inspected.

Click here to take action about Animal Welfare Unit under funding

Monitoring of animal cruelty at the port is often left to animal welfare groups or concerned individuals.

However, most cruelty in live export occurs out at sea where perpetrators are beyond the jurisdictional reach of the state governments.

Whats Happening at Fremantle Port?

The following animals were observed at Fremantle Port

This sheep was observed to have a profusely bleeding horn. Standard 1.7 of the Australian Standards for the Export of Livestock says that an animal who has a bleeding horn must be rejected from the export chain.

These images captured by volunteers show a sheep with its leg painfully trapped in a truck.  In WA, with an under-funded Animal Welfare Unit, there is no one to call to report this.

This image is of a sheep with a blind eye. Standard 1.7 of the Australian Standards for the Export of Livestock says that an animal who is blind in one or both eyes must be rejected from the export chain.

This image is of a sheep with Keratoconjuntivitis, also known as pink eye, in its right eye. Standard 1.7 of the Australian Standards for the Export of Livestock says that an animal who has keratoconjunctivitis must be rejected from the export chain.

These photos were taken at Fremantle Port, Western Australia bound for the live export market. These photographs of live sheep export show limbs protruding from the truck and other issues.  Often, drivers are not aware of their responsibilities under State and Federal legislation and codes.  Driver training is essential and authorities should be at both the feedlot and port for loading and unloading.

How are Animals treated once they reach the Middle East?

Most sheep exported from Australia are slaughtered in a way which would be unacceptable and illegal in Australia.

Footage and photographs obtained in Kuwait and Bahrain show terrified Australian sheep being manhandled, trussed, thrown, shoved into car boots and lying across the bodies of other bloodied dying sheep on roadsides, before having their throats cut whilst fully conscious. In one incident in Kuwait three Australian sheep were forced into a boot whilst another terrified animal purchased for sacrifice was transported to a private premises chained by his neck to the winch of a tow truck.  This is simply horrific stuff in anyone’s book.

Click here to watch WSPA’s footage 

Click here to watch Animals Australia’s 2010 footage

How are animals treated once the reach Indonesia?

A joint industry and Government report concluded that Australian cattle are subjected to shocking cruelty in Indonesian abattoirs. The report found that it takes an average of four cuts to the throat for the animal to die.

What is most shocking is that cattle are placed in slaughter restraint boxes that are not legally able to be used in Australia.  The box intentionally trips the animal so that it falls on its side. Cattle are dying very slowly and cruelly in these abattoirs. On average, cattle rise 3.5 times which usually results in them hitting their heads on the concrete. The authors of the study observed one cow who needed to have its throat cut 18 times before it finally died.

Slaughter methods are not the only concern. As 80% of animals that are unloaded are sent to one of 120 locations, this often results in poor animal welfare outcomes. Animals have to be transported multiple times and are often left without food or water.

The live export industry has been exporting cattle to Indonesia for nearly 20 years yet we are still seeing major animal cruelty issues and contraventions of the OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health)”. If this is the best the live export industry and the Australian government can do after 19 years, it is obvious that they do not place any importance whatsoever on animal welfare.

Read the full report here.

Don’t Middle Eastern and Muslim consumers demand live animals due to inadequate refrigeration?

This is an unfortunate commonly used marketing ploy used by live exporters that is not only incorrect but culturally insensitive. Even the Australian government acknowledges that the live trade to the Middle East is not driven by a lack of available refrigeration. (source: ABARE 2008), yet this is a myth perpetuated by Politicians and industry alike.

When WSPA’s Campaign Manager, Jessica Borg visited the Middle East, she said that “The idea that everyone in the Middle East goes to a wet market and lacks proper refrigeration is simply misguided. They even have air-conditioned bus stops over here. Living in the Middle East without access to refrigeration is just not possible.” 

Australia mainly exports to the Gulf region of the Middle East, which is rich in resources. There are only two religious ceremonies where live animals are required on mass. For every day meat products, consumers in the Middle East generally buy products from a supermarket.

Won’t Australia help improve animal welfare standards in the Middle East if it continues to export animals there?

Australia has been exporting live animals to the Middle East for over 30 years. Footage taken at Middle Eastern abattoirs at the end of 2010 indicates that animal welfare standards are negligible or non-existent.

Click here to watch WSPA’s footage

Click here to watch Animals Australia’s 2010 footage

The live export industry's claim that they might try to improve animal welfare by exporting animals to the Middle East has only emerged in the last few years since animal welfare groups have exposed the handling and slaughter practices in the Middle East.

Australia has no control over handling and slaughter practices in the Middle East. However, Australia can choose not to sell animals into a situation where we are certain that they will be subjected to horrific cruelty.

The only way to ensure that animals are handled humanely as possible is to slaughter them in Australia and export them as chilled or frozen meat

But don’t Middle Eastern consumers want live animals from Australia?

The Middle East loves frozen Australian sheep meat. It is Halal, disease free and good quality. The Middle East already imports far more frozen meat from Australia than they import live animals.

In 2005 the total value of processed meat exports was over $5.9 billion compared to around $700 million for live exports. (Reference: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry) The Economic Comparison of Live Export Vs Total Meat Exports from Australia 2004/5 (Source: ABS)

The Economic Comparison of Live Export Vs Total Meat Exports from Australia 2004/5
(Source: ABS)

Cattle
Live export of cattle:	$464 million (FOB value*)	(623,579 live cattle)
Beef exports:	$4.9 billion	(947,866 tonnes)
Sheep
Live export of Sheep:	$210 million (FOB* value)	(3,236,415 live sheep)
Lamb exports	$701 million	(123,060 tonnes)
Mutton exports	$418 million	(136,718 tonnes)
Total value of chilled meat exports	$1.119 billion
*Free On Board – the value of the animals before loading in Australia

What happened when live exports are suspended to certain countries?

When the trade to Egypt was suspended, additional chilled meat was imported from Australia.

After the trade to Saudi Arabia was suspended after the Cormo Express disaster, there was a 67% increase in mutton exports.

But aren’t we are supplying an important source of protein in the Middle East?

We can still provide that protein via chilled meat.

All of the Middle Eastern countries which import sheep from Australia are wealthy nations.

What about the farmers? Don’t they need the live export market?

The farmers need not be so worried.  See our open statement to farmers by clicking here. Australia already exports billions of dollars worth of frozen meat to many countries including the Middle East. In fact, the live export trade is just a tiny proportion of Australia’s livestock industry.[Australia’s live export trade accounts for less than 5% of the value of Australia’s livestock industries.

Product	Value (A$M)	% of Total Industry
Cattle/calves	$6338	38%
Milk	$2808	17%
Wool	$2394	14%
Lamb/sheepmeat	$1776	11%
Poultry	$1281	8%
Pigs	$878	5%
Live exports (sheep & cattle)	$580	4%
Other livestock products	$461	3%
Total	$16,516
Ref – ABARE (2005) Statistical Tables, Australian Commodities, 12(1), Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

Clearly, far greater long-term security for both Australian farmers and Australian workers in meat processing industries in Australia could be created through vigorous marketing of Australian chilled disease-free meat to importing countries.

But if Australia stopped exporting animals, wouldn’t importing countries source animals from countries with inferior animal welfare standards?

According to many industry representatives, no other country is currently able to supply the same volume of sheep to the Middle East that Australia can.

Also, it is difficult to imagine animal welfare standards worse than those conducted by Australia’s live export industry. Australia’s distance from importing countries means that our animals are forced to travel much longer distances than local animals would, and our animals are less suitable for the stress of handling and transport because they have such limited contact with humans. (Jones, B & Hart, S 2008) Situation report on the long-distance transportation of live animals for slaughter in Australia and export for slaughter overseas, WSPA Sydney

At various times when the live export trade to Egypt and Saudi has been suspended, these countries simply purchase more chilled meat from Australia.

Do Middle Eastern consumers demand live animals so that they can be assured they are killed in the Halal manner?

Most animals slaughtered in Australia are already slaughtered in a Halal manner. Australia has many certified Halal slaughterhouses, with the slaughter of each animal overseen by Muslim officials who are licensed by importing countries. Halal accreditation of meat is administered under the 'Australian Government Supervised Muslim Slaughter Programme'.

For example, the largest sheep meat processor in Australia is Fletcher International, which operates a large abattoir in Albany, Western Australia, and another in Dubbo, New South Wales. All of the animals slaughtered at Fletcher are slaughtered in a Halal manner and the animals are sold to various markets, including the Middle East.

Islamic leaders have approved the pre-stunning of sheep and cattle prior to the cutting of the throat. Because electrical stunning is 'reversible', the animal is not injured and still alive, the practice is consistent with Islamic requirements.[Soft Break][Soft Break]Recent footage of investigations in the Middle East show that the way animals are being slaughtered is not in accordance with Halal principles, which are:

• Not killing animals in the presence of other animals

• The animals are not to be bound

• The slaughterman makes a dedication of the animal to “Allah”

• The animal being slaughtered must face Mecca

• The animal should be killed with a single cut to the throat with a long sharp blade

• The animal must not suffer prior to slaughter

Will the inclusion of a veterinarian on board each ship protect the welfare of animals?

Not really. A shipboard veterinarian may have responsibility for more than 100,000 animals on board.

Despite the presence of a veterinarian on each long haul shipment to the. Sick or moribund animals are not routinely euthanased. Most animals who die on live export ships are found dead in their pens – they are not euthanased before they reach this point.